Divided Loyalties and Police Culture

Divided loyalties among the personnel of any given department does not require an issue to occur. This sort of near crippling problem can take place when groups of officers feel stronger loyalties to one commander or another, or when those in command throw their lot in with different local politicians and city officials who may each have opposing goals.

What follows is a cautionary tale, exemplifying just how far groups of officers can deteriorate, when loyalties are strained, twisted, and diverted.

In Crestview, Florida the department's trouble began after Maj. Joseph Floyd joined their ranks. Unknown to his fellow officers, Floyd had a record that would have rivaled that of many harden criminals. For 8 straight years this supposed officer of the law was fired, quit, or forced to resign from three separate police departments for charges ranging from falsifying reports, lying, insubordination, and excessive force. However, Floyd's transgressions started long before he was ever given a badge. Even as a civilian he had been arrested for disorderly conduct, assaulting an officer, and battery.

He would continue his deviancy well into his new career with the Crestview police department. By 2012 he would be investigated by a grand jury for such offenses as altering testimonies, forging incident reports, soliciting sex from residents, beating handcuffed suspects, intimidating and threatening members of the community, sexually assaulting a fellow female officer, and causing a pregnant woman to miscarriage after ramming her vehicle with his car.

How was it possible for such an individual to acquire a job at Crestview's department? This is where divide in loyalties begin. Floyd was old friends with police chief Brian Mitchell, who despite being fully aware of his record and criminal past, shielded him from the investigation process of normal hiring procedures. Mitchell made a conscious decision to place his loyalty to his friend above that of his subordinates. In doing such-- if even unintentionally-- he placed the safety of those officers, along with the integrity, and reputation of the entire Crestview department, in jeopardy.

How did the hiring of Floyd lead to the turmoil and divided loyalties that plagued the department for years? This created a “Us vs Them” scenario between those officers that went along and covered for Floyd, and thus stood with the chief, and those who openly resisted to cover or follow his lead.

The Officers who made attempts to complain about Floyd's less than professional conduct, or wanted to file a report about some criminal activity they personally witnessed, Mitchell reportedly ordered them “to go through the chain of command”, which he was more than aware meant these very same officers would have to report directly to Floyd to do so. This was later proven to be nothing more than blatant scare and intimidation tactics meant to dissuade any further attempts against his friend.

Of course, in such work conditions where co-workers began to lose trust in each other, and the command structure, moral quickly began to rapidly disintegrate. Those officers that wanted to do what was right found themselves trapped in an increasingly hostile environment where threats of termination, demotion, and reassignment were not only constant, but also coupled with overt harassment. Floyd even began instructing his unit, now more loyal to him than to the rest of their department, to spy and report to him on fellow officers who were not loyal.

The growing division lead to a decrease in Crestview police performance. Floyd's unit routinely harried, arrested, and planted evidence on members of the surrounding community. By the end their corruption became some brazen they began investigating members of other departments, and local politicians simply in search of some information they could use in bribery.

Eventually the grand jury would charge Floyd with Racketeering, with others pending further investigation. Investigation would also be conducted on Mitchell but no criminal charges leveled against him. Instead a report about the chief said, “His failure to redress Maj. Floyd's offensive and humiliating conduct toward women and co-workers was indefensible”. He was summarily fired.

A new police chief, Tony Taylor, would step in with hopes of rebuilding the badly damaged Crestview department. However, by then, even after the removal of the trouble elements, the damages were extensive. mistrust, low morale, and resentment was deeply set among those remaining officers who found themselves targeted, abused and mistreated by a system they once believed in.

Even Taylor would eventually admit that the divided loyalties left him struggling to unite the department once more after all the ruin left by Mitchell and Floyd. Further making an already tense matters more difficult was also having to face the erosion of trust from the surrounding community.

Perhaps it is not much in the wake of so much hardship, but the grand jurors would note in their report that the officers that remained dedicated and devoted to their duties, despite such a clearly dysfunctional and hostile environment were “exemplary and heartening”. Maybe are a sign that Crestview has a chance at redemption, and regaining the communities trust.

In the end, an officers of any given department effectiveness, or integrity should not be judged based solely on how loyal they are to one another, or to different individuals. This is more inline with one of the ways members of crime syndicates, or street gangs prove their worth. If being an officer of the law only required a gang mentality, numbers, and weapons, then local officials could begin rounding up members of the Crips, M13, or Skinheads to serve as the city's enforcement agents.

The men, and women of law enforcement must also have loyalty for the oath, and duties they have been entrusted with. They are more than guns, or authority, as they also represent the law, integrity, and protection. When police officers begin choosing individual loyalties above the law, tragedy, corruption, and shame is never far behind.

References

Riggs, M. (2012, March 13). Meet Maj. Joseph Floyd, Leading Candidate for Most Crooked Cop in America. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from https://reason.com/blog/2012/03/13/meet-maj-joseph-floyd-the-most-crooked-c

Pruett, T. (2015, August 20). Court upholds Floyd’s racketeering conviction. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from http://www.nwfdailynews.com/article/20150820/NEWS/150829928

 

The Corruption of Duty: When Law Enforcement Becomes Criminal

Abraham Lincoln is credited with saying, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.”

There is something especially loathsome, sickening and offensive when those who have sworn an oath to protect society instead turn their granted authority towards illicit means of self-gratification and abuse. Corruption remains a ever present problem that shadows every facet of law enforcement on both a local and federal level. The opportunities to fall can appear in many forms, as seemingly innocuous as falsifying parts of a report to protect a colleague that has potentially crossed the line while dealing with a suspect. Or as apparently wrong as rationalizing reasons to take some of the money found during a drug bust.

The corruption of duty in law enforcement always effects far more than just the apparent individuals immediately involved with the unfortunate situation. It erodes essential public trust, and harms the overall legitimacy of police work.

It was Sir Robert Peel's, rightfully credited with a great many policing techniques that are still relevant in these modern times, famously wrote, “the police are the people and the people are the police,” further emphasizing a belief that policing was an inclusive effort that required both the surrounding community and authorities working in tandem to create a harmonious relationship beneficial to all involved. When the community and police divide into sides there are no benefits for either.

There appears to be two frequent themes that lead to corruption in law enforcement. The first is harmatia, which was a staple in many classic Greek tragedies, is described by a majority of modern scholars as a “tragic flaw” of character that ultimately leads to an extremely poor judgment call. Classic literary characters who can serve as glowing examples of this are Macbeth; who was overly ambitious to a point of greed, Or Othello; who was intensely prideful and prone to jealousy. In law enforcement harmatia can be exemplified in such scenarios surrounding police officers who desire to clean up a crime ridden area, and begin justifying using false reports and planted evidence on suspects to accomplish such means. However when such dishonest tactics are finally discovered their actions have the completely opposite effect of making a city a safer because all their cases, even those completely just, may be overturned allowing even individuals guilty of violent crimes free.

The second is hubris, when one in a position of power loses focus of reality as they instead overestimate their capabilities and competence, allowing past successes or the authority of their station lead them into a foolish mistake they should have otherwise been aware of. “Pride goeth before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall” is a proverb that fits perfectly in this definition. In law enforcement an officer may fall prey to hubris as they come to believe their role elevates them above many of the very same laws they are enforcing.

Unfortunately many men and women who are entrusted with a badge tend to also begin, or perhaps have always secretly believed, that such a duty also gives them some sort of fringe benefits and extra privileges beyond those of the average American citizen. There should be two truths drilled into every trainee in any given department from the very start; being an officer of the law only brings a sense of pride and more responsibilities.

Becoming a member of any form of law enforcement does offer a great deal of authority. The more power any man or woman is given, the more they will be forced to confront an internal struggle between their moral identity, their own level of aggressiveness, and what is considered ethical. This inner conflict theoretically leads to two types of outcomes when an individual finds themselves in a place of authority.

The first, and perhaps worst outcome, is referred to as “personalized power”, leading to a situation when power, and all its possible benefits, are internalized and used to gain of the individual more than anyone else. The second, and an outcome the world sorely needs more of, is called “socialized power’. This refers to when an individual decides to actively use their sphere of influence for the betterment and benefit of all concerned. They may utilize their wealth to fund community projects, bring altruistic laws into existence, and other such communal acts with an overall benevolent goal.

To a much lesser degree, far below the lofty machinations and powers possessed by rulers, being a police officer in any given society, is a level of authority a great majority of common citizens will never experience. When the environment, culture and role of law enforcement is dissected, examined, and studied more closely, it becomes much easier, if even no more excusable, to comprehend how and why the threat of corruption is always present. Such corruption can occur so quickly, that large numbers of officers or even an entire department’s culture can fall prey before anyone discovers it is happening. 

Everyone from the cops patrolling the inner cities, correctional officers keeping watch over prisons, to FBI agents tracking shady financial dealings, all members of law enforcement constantly confront a side of society most people would prefer not to think about. Eventually, most likely sooner than later, there will come a time when the opportunity to profit will present itself during the course of duty. Be it during a raid where stacks of money or drugs are seized, a bribe to turn a blind eye to some illicit act, or encouragement to be a “team player” by helping those

An often over looked accelerator or deterrent to police corruption is Subculture, the bond, attitudes, beliefs, traditions and perceptions sometimes shared by as many as a majority of officers of any given department. Is there a strict “no gratuities” policy upheld? Is there a shared view of a particular population of people within that given city or town? What is the relationship like between the officers and the administrators? Or is there a “warrior culture” upheld by any number of colleagues? All these, and many more, serve as possible factors that can or may lead to either honorable behavior or immoral decisions.

It should be noted that police corruption does not just occur on its own. It is often aided, if even unintentionally, by beliefs and practices held almost ‘sacred’ by some departments. Power and the Blue Curtain go together quite well. The LAPD’s anti-gang unit is a granted example of protecting officers despite being aware of their questionable actions. Instead of stepping in and ending the terrible misdeeds of their compatriots, these officers were far more concern of keeping to an outdated code.

Such beliefs and practices also lead to the near dissolution of the Crestview, Florida police department. Their troubles began almost immediately after one Maj. Joseph Floyd joined their ranks. Floyd had an extensive criminal record. For 8 straight years this supposed officer of the law was fired, quit, or forced to resign from three separate police departments for various charges ranging from falsifying reports, lying, insubordination, and excessive force.

How was it possible for such a questionable individual to acquire a job at Crestview's department? Floyd also just happen to be old friends with then police chief, Brian Mitchell, who despite being fully aware of his record and criminal dealings, shielded him from the investigation process of normal hiring procedures.

During his time with the Crestview department, Floyd and several other officers that joined him, would go on a literal crime spree until 2012, when he would be investigated by a grand jury for such offenses as altering testimonies, forging incident reports, soliciting sex from residents, beating handcuffed suspects, intimidating and threatening members of the community, sexually assaulting a fellow female officer, and causing a pregnant woman to miscarriage after ramming her vehicle with his car.

In many ways, Mitchell was just as, if not more responsible for the scandals that rocked his police department. He was their commander, was well aware of what was occurring, but never once made an attempt to stop officers under his personal command from repeatedly breaking the law. Investigation would also be conducted on Mitchell but no criminal charges leveled against him. Instead a report about the chief said, “His failure to redress Maj. Floyd's offensive and humiliating conduct toward women and co-workers was indefensible”. He was quickly fired. Despite losing his job in disgrace, in many ways he got off easy.

Much like Crestview, or Rampart Gang Unit, it often seems like the individuals involved in trying to hide these scandals, are unable to see, or simply refuse to understand, protecting questionable tactics and rogue elements will ultimately cause a great deal more damage than initially exposing those perpetrators responsible.

What is it about ‘power’ that seems to so easily extract the worst of flaws and traits from within many individuals? Is it because men and women tend to lose themselves as their sphere of authority expands further? Or does a badge, crown, or office that affords them influence, with less societal constraints, simply brings their true nature to the surface?

Sometimes corruption of duty is not as simple as a criminal being hired and given a badge, or a compromise of morals based solely on possible greed. Like with many instance concerning humanity throughout the ages, sometimes people attempt to do the right thing but begin going astray at some point. The so-called, Oakland Riders are an example of both harmatia and hubris.

A group composed of four veteran officers; Clarence “Chuck” Manbanag, Jude Siapno, Matthew Hornung, and Frank Vazquez, these officers were routinely praised by their superiors, for bringing in record numbers of reputed drug dealers and gang members from the streets. These men seemingly possessed an iron-clad dedication to the law, and their drive to ‘clean-up’ West Oakland for decent people. However, as frequently is the case, appearances can be deceiving.

To accomplish their goals these police officers repeatedly, and flagrantly broke the law on countless occasions with such tactics ranging from intimidation through violence, coercion, falsified reports, false arrests, planting evidence, excessive force, and even abductions. This cavalier attitude, and callous disregard was fueled by the belief that their suspects were less deserving or rights than others due to their reputations or past crimes.

The Riders allegedly brutalized a number of suspects in their quests to either obtain information, get them to inform on others, or just to teach individuals a lesson when there was not enough evidence to formally charge them. Eventually their shameful deeds came to light, and in 2000, the four were formally brought up on charges.

The hubris of these officers, despite having should have known better, lead them to believe they were exempt from the laws they were enforcing, and that their subculture as “the Riders” somehow made them elite even among their colleagues. The harmatia is that the goal was to “clean up” downtown Oakland and make it a safer place, but their actions as rogues led to a great number of cases being overturned, and cost Oakland a combined 10 million in damages.

James Baldwin once wrote; “No one is more dangerous than he who imagines himself pure in heart: for his purity, by definition, is unassailable.” I would argue that it is a potentially dangerous line of thinking, and attitude for members of law enforcement to readily believe they are automatically superior to the criminals they apprehend. I do not state such as a snide attempt to degrade or belittle the law enforcement community.

Then is it hopeless? Is there no way to stop the growing divide between law enforcement and the communities they are suppose to serve? No way to repair the extensive damage to the public's trust?

In Rich Martin's essay, Police Corruption: An Analytical Look into Police Ethics, he explains preventing corruption in any agency or department; never hire unethical individuals. Any and all agencies must screen and scrutinize their candidates with stringent care. Ethics training and courses must be a strict part of all courses for recruits. Then once these new officers or agents are on the job their supervisors must remain vigilant, actively reviewing their choices, decisions and integrity for extended periods of time.

Some would argue that the field of law enforcement is difficult. That unless you have experienced it than you have no understanding of the culture or incredible stress these men and women are under. And to which I would respond; they are absolutely correct. However, it is a duty they accepted, and it must be upheld to the strictest standards of integrity or simply not at all. 

 

Bibliography

Martin, R. (2011, May 12). Police Corruption: An Analytical Look into Police Ethics . FBI.ORG. Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement bulletin/may_2011/law_enforcement_professionalism

Riggio, R. (2008, June 7). How Power Corrupts Leaders. Psychology Today: Health, Help, Happiness + Find a Therapist. Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/200908/how-power-corrupts-leaders

Garone, L. (2003, January 26). Oakland's Police 'Riders' on Trial (washingtonpost.com). Oakland's Police 'Riders' on Trial (washingtonpost.com). Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://www.garone.com/writing/riders.html

Shea, C. (2012, October 2). Why Power Corrupts | Smithsonian. History, Travel, Arts, Science, People, Places | Smithsonian. Retrieved April 24, 2014, from http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/Why-Power-Corrupts-169804606.html

McLAUGHLIN, T. (2012, March 16). Crestview chief: Police Department remains divided. - Local. Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.nwfdailynews.com/local/crestview-chief-police-department-remains-divided-1.105999

Cultural Soup or Salad?: The Pros and Cons of Cultural Assimilation

Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the U.S, once said;
 
“In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

His beliefs on immigration, as demonstrated above, was that there was room in America for new immigrants, but those arriving immigrant populations, upon touching down on these shores, were to completely forgo their former national identities, and fully embrace their new home in language, culture, identity, and spirit. Some would consider the above beliefs prejudice towards immigrants. Yet, is it really unfair to require loyalty in exchange for the better opportunities immigrants arrive to seek?

Cultural Assimilation is defined as; “process by which a person or a group's language and/or culture come to resemble those of another group”. However, this is a clean, well defined definition, and things rarely ever remain-- or even begin-- as well defined when concerning humanity, and life. Cultural Assimilation is a term that is frequently used, but appears either little understood, and also holding many different definitions depending on the individual, or group that is chanting it (Skerry, P. 2000, March 1).

Dr. Peter Salins readily points out that the problems of immigration is not one of newcomers, but instead newcomers that refuse to melt into the culture they are attempting to be apart of. He goes on to argue that there are three criteria, if met, would cause the U.S at large to more openly embrace these new arrivals. The first is learning, and accepting U.S English as the national language. The second, they should live by the Protestant work ethic, a belief of self-reliance, hard-work, and morally upright behavior. The third, is to visibly, and enthusiastically take pride in America's liberal democratic and egalitarian principals (Salins, P. 1998, March 1)

If one feels, behaves, and believes in America, are they not American? Perhaps it is not nearly as simple as blending in.

The arguments against the idea of Cultural Assimilation are varied. Immigrant community leaders, advocates, and many more liberal thinkers argue that there is little use in immigration for “people of color” because assimilation hardly ever guarantees acceptance into the mainstream culture of the U.S Skerry, P. 2000, March 1) .

The Cherokees, who lived in Georgia during the 1800s, built Angelo-American style schools, churches, and homes, founded a newspaper, changed the way they dressed, and adopted English. This tribe even went as far to have slaves. However, their attempts at assimilation were repaid with an incident remembered as “the Trail of Tears”, when they were forcefully removed from their land (White, R. 1992) and forced into a literal death march.

 African-Americans, especially throughout the 50's, used a substance known as Conk to straighten their hair (Untangling Black Hair. 2001), or sought ways to permanently lighten their skin (Why the obsession with lighter skin? 2014, February 20). Chinese, and Japanese immigrants frequently adopted more Angelo-America sounding names, and also the English language. However, all such attempts were seen with bemusement at best, or met with outright ridicule, and animosity at worst. Their goals to be more Angelo-American did not protect either of the above, or many other populations from racial slurs, violence, segregation, or injustice. It can be rightfully argued that these people willingly gave up their traditions, language, and culture, and were rewarded with nothing but further scorn.

In the end it does not matter how much wants to belong, if the club, culture, population, or country does not want them. Becoming American is not solely the responsibility of the immigrant, as their efforts should be met with hospitality. Without the latter such strife will always remain.

Reference

1.White, R. (1992). Trail of Tears. Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://www.powersource.com/cocinc/history/trail.htm

2.Skerry, P. (2000, March 1). Do We Really Want Immigrants to Assimilate? Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2000/03/immigration-skerry

3.Untangling Black Hair. (2001). Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CEsQFjAJ&url=http://understandingblackhair.com/our-history/&ei=2xGHVdezFYHboATJvovgDQ&usg=AFQjCNFNtmS_N2wERBPhWpBIg4C2Lxsivw

4.Why the obsession with lighter skin? (2014, February 20). Retrieved June 21, 2015.

5.Salins, P. (1998, March 1). Assimilation, American Style by Peter D. Salins. Retrieved June 21, 2015, from http://fee.org/freeman/detail/assimilation-american-style-by-peter-d-salins

Drone Warfare

Though popular, and widespread, technically the term “drone” is erroneous. The U.S military refer to these machines as Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), while many within the Pentagon still use the original name, Unmanned Ariel Vehicle (UAV).

The earliest known concept for the modern drone first appeared in a 1940's issue of Popular Mechanics as a joint collaborative idea between of both Dr. Lee De Forest and U.A Sanabria.

However the first actual prototypes John Stuart Foster Jr, a man who was a nuclear physicist by trade, and a model airplane hobbyist during his leisure. By 1973, Foster would go on to present two prototypes during a display for observes from the Defense Advance Projects Agency (DARPA). Both proto-drones, he named “Praeire” and “Calere”, were powered by modified lawn-mower engines, and demonstrated the then impressive capability of sustaining a two hour flight while carrying up to 28 pounds a piece.

The first use of these machines in an actual combat situation occurred in 1973, when the nation of Israel used modified target drones, a model known specifically as the Ryan Firebee series, in the Yom Kippur War. These drones were deployed as decoys against the Egyptian military, deceiving their forces into firing the entirety of their anti-aircraft missiles munitions, leaving them decidedly open to actual fighter planes that exploited their mistake. Through the remaining years of the 70's, and much of the 80's, Israel would go on to become the pioneers in developing and deploying UAVs for various missions ranging from surveillance to decoys.

However, despite being the leading innovator in drone technology, it would be Iran, and not Israel, who would become the first nation to deploy the first actual “armed drone”. During the Iran-Iraq War, the former armed a drone with six RPG rounds to strike at targets.

The U.S, having watched the successful use of these drones, began developing their own program. In 1991 during the First Gulf War, the U.S was able to wage a UAV war, keeping at least one drone airborne at all times through the entire conflict. Witnessing this phenomenal success would lead a number of other nations to follow suit and began investing in their own drone programs.

Many falsely believe that modern UAS vehicles are piloted by a single individual with slightly less simplicity of a RC plane. The truth is far more complicated. These machines, such as the MQ-9 Reaper model, require three pilots, including a maintenance crew that handles both take-off and recovery. While it is true these drones can indeed preform some procedures autonomously, such as hold a given flight pattern, draw fuel from its wings, and report any mechanical failures, they still require a human presence.

Drones have become an extremely valuable asset to military and espionage actions. Those who back their increased use argue that the very nature of the war in Iraq, and the continued operations in Afghanistan, are very different from those fought in the past. U.S soldiers frequently find themselves in already dangerous combat situation made increasingly perilous and difficult when facing enemies using guerrilla tactics where insurgents can blend in with the local population until the opportunity to strike arrives, then just as easily vanish once more. Increasing the number of soldiers not only promises more opportunities and targets for the enemy to strike, but also increases the risk of collateral damage against civilians.

When facing an enemy that relies on hit-and-run tactics and sabotage, surveillance and intelligence is far more effective than simply increasing artillery and manpower. This is the vital place drones have began filling. A drone has the ability to gather video, audio and electronic information for hours at a time in high-risk situations, but without the risking the lives of actual pilots.

However, the development and escalating boom of UAVs have not gone as smoothly as much of the public would believe. Drones have become a very useful asset, and there for, a very powerful source of leverage. n 2010 alone, the Defense Department spent an estimated 2.5 billion on these machines, and such has lead to building tensions between different departments within the Pentagon.

Some, such as Senator John McCain, Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, and many others, have began voicing concern about the CIA having its own fleet of drones as the agency, in some opinions, leaves its espionage roots and become increasingly more militarized. Such an example has been the CIA using drones to launch missiles at targets in other countries without the authorization of Congress. The airstrikes continuing to pound targets-- and kill an increasing number of civilians-- in Pakistan are CIA operations.

Gordon Adams, a senior defense analyst at the Stimson Center, has referred to the brewing situation as “A turf fight in the disguise of a policy debate.”

Currently the CIA and Pentagon both operate their own fleet of drones dedicated to the ongoing mission of eliminating senior figures within al Qaeda, and other priority targets in other undisclosed locations. Currently the CIA's role is to gather and supply reconnaissance on the location, and identities of possible targets while the actual decision to strike falls to the Pentagon. However, the agency has been slowly, but steadily gaining more freedom and independence with its fleet.

If we are to believe reports, there has been 4 Americans killed in drone attacks since 2009. While it has been said that three of these individuals were not specifically targeted in these strikes, one Anwar al-Awlaki, killed in Yemen, was a different story. However, the debate is not whether or not these people were truly potential threats or not, and instead that the U.S government executed American citizens without due process or trial. It was simply decided they must die and such was carried out.

Does that not pave the way for a potentially dangerous precedent? Can we, the American people, simply believe our government, who have been decidedly dishonest concerning less pressing matters back home, to be honest about something as dangerous as who is or is not an enemy worthy only of swift death?

Yet, what of those who live in countries where drones strikes are frequent and sudden? Frequently, the sort of news fed to the American people paint Pakistan as a place where only insurgents, terrorist and their sympathizers live. Such could not be further from the truth. No matter how hard we would like to pretend. For those innocent men, women and children living in villages in Northwest Pakistan the drones are said to constantly hover in the skies above. Their Sword of Damocles like presence frightening and constant reminder that at given moment of the day a missile can rain from the sky without warning. This perpetual state of hyper-vigilance, fear and anxiety has begun to have detrimental psychological effects on the local population.

The continuous anticipation of a sudden and violent death against forces they are powerless to defend themselves from has also begun breaking down the communities. In a number of villages many of its members have begun refusing to attend important meetings, such as those concerning internal or tribal dispute resolutions, funerals, weddings and prayer because they are afraid gathering in numbers, the very same right we Americans take for granted, will attract the attention of a pilot who will than open fire. Such fears are justified with tragic stories of weddings, religious celebrations and other social events having been struck by mistake.

Such fears are fanned by incidents like that which occurred in the Yemeni city of Rad'a when a drone opened fire on a large gathering because it was believed to be a caravan composed of an affiliated al-Qaeda group. Instead the pilot mistakenly attacked civilians who were all apart of a wedding procession, outright killing 12 and wounding an estimated 15 others.

Human Rights Watch has revealed as many as 12 civilians were killed in December when a U.S. drone targeted vehicles that were part of a wedding procession going toward the groom’s village outside the central Yemeni city of Rad’a. According to HRW, "some, if not all those killed and wounded were civilians" and not members of the armed group al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula as U.S. and Yemeni government officials initially claimed. The report concluded that the attack killed 12 men, between the ages of 20 and 65, and wounded 15 others. It cites accounts from survivors, relatives of the dead, local officials and news media reports.

As the civilian casualties mount, to these populations, the U.S has become a callous power unleashing mechanical monsters against them for reasons they do not understand. Far more distressing is the way many militant groups seize these opportunities to bolster their ranks by using the example of indiscriminate drone strikes as an example to why their cause is just and worth joining. The U.S appears more and more as the devils these fanatics claim, and the callous use of these machines help pave the way for their propaganda with increasing ease.
And what of the pilots? Some critics argue that drone pilots are being desensitized as they control these machines from thousands a miles away with what arguably can be described as a video game. Such imagines have been further invoked upon discovering that a number of pilots refer to kills as “bug-splatter”. However, while there may be some truly callous pilots, it would be unfair to label every individual operator as such due to a colloquialism used by some.

Also, people have used such terms when it comes to violence and killing for generations. Words like fragged, dusted, buttoned-up, given the business, are just a few people have used in both war and gang violence as a means of distancing themselves from what they are actually doing. Even where I grew up at, East Oakland in the 90's, we often used “blasted” or “smoked” when someone was killed.

On the contrary, for the most part, drone pilots are not children having a blast as they guide real killing machine with video game like controllers. Killing has, and still does, take its toll on many of these men and women. While it is undoubtedly true that these pilots are not on the front lines like infantrymen, their missions often force them to watch individuals for days, weeks or even months, witnessing the target go about their lives, interact with others, perhaps visit loved ones, then the order to kill them is given. Perhaps far worse these missions require the pilots continue surveillance of the grisly aftermath for hours.

In a 2013 Live Science article; “Drone Wars: Pilots Reveal Debilitating Stress Beyond Virtual Battlefield”, an Air Force veteran and former drone pilot, who only wished to be identified as 'Slim' in order to protect his identity had this to say about the experiences he and his colleagues deal with;

“While the enemy is the enemy, you still understand that they are a real person. To extinguish a person's life is a very personal thing. While physically we don't experience the five senses when we engage a target — unlike [how] an infantryman might — in my experience, the emotional impact on the operator is equal."

Out of 1,100 pilots interviewed during an Air Force study revealed that 30 percent admitted to feeling burned out, suffered from high levels of stress and fatigue. A further 17 percent are considered “clinically distressed” which simply means the levels of stress has become detrimental enough to negatively affect these pilots professional and personal lives.

Perhaps the lesson in all this is that killing is not and should never come without consequences. Humanity has always searched for more effective ways to fight and kill one another. We have come a long, long away since bludgeoning one another to death with blunt objects. However, it is sometimes clear only our weapons have advanced while our base nature still has so much control.

Perhaps there should never be a way or time where wars are 'costless' because it is only through the lost of life, pain and mourning that humanity eventually tires out to return to short lived peace. The Drone Program has been repeatedly sold to Americans like some sort of miracle drug that will offer nothing but benefits with no negative side-effects. However, there is a cost. Be it the constant terror being visited upon innocent civilians, the silently suffering pilots being swept under the rug, or the U.S credibility and reputation, none of this has been free and the tab is still running.

Or perhaps the snake-oil sales men plugging this product were telling half truths. When a pilot burns out they just replace them with another. When civilians die just under report, or outright omit their deaths. In the end they reap the benefits while everyone else foot the bill. Imagine that.

America is more than just a physical place. It is also a series of noble ideas concerning liberty, freedom and justice...however we have never truly lived up to that potential. Not fully. It was made a lie during the slaughter of the Native Americans, Slavery, Jim Crow, mass discrimination against the Irish, the callous disregard and oppression of women, the internment of the Japanese, and many others.

Even now, many Americans are fooled that they still live in a Democracy that espouse those ideas despite the supposedly “free markets” being 90% owned by 6 corporations, of Comcast and AT&T pushing for an blatant monopoly of the internet, and nearly 7 million Americans used as slave labor in prisons. The ideas of liberty, justice and freedom now only truly exist for the wealthy, their bought politicians, and the corporations, the freedom to lie, steal, circumvent the laws

We, the U.S could become all we ever claimed to aspire to. We could truly become an enlightened nation, and beacon of freedom, truth and compassion if we truly desired it. However, this path we currently walk is one littered with the bodies and scarred psyches of the innocent. Ultimately this blood is not only on the Obama Administration's, and political elites hands. In the end the American people are also responsible if they choose not to speak out.

Bibliography

1)Byrd, M. (2006, June 11). The U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection. The U.S. Army Professional Writing Collection. Retrieved April 27, 2014, from http://www.army.mil/professionalWriting/volumes/volume4/june_2006/6_06_4.html

2) Professor James Cavallaro, Stephan Sonnenberg, Professor Sarah Knuckey, Adelina Acuña, Mohammad M. Ali, Anjali Deshmukh, Jennifer Gibson, Jennifer Ingram, Dimitri Phillips, Wendy Salkin, Omar Shakir, Christopher Holland, Cavallaro, Sonnenberg, Knuckey, Acuña, Ali, Deshmukh, Gibson, Salkin, and Shakir (2013) Living Under Drone

Retrieved from: http://www.livingunderdrones.org/

3) Boggioni, T. (2014, April 13). Artists install massive poster of child’s face in Pakistan field to shame drone operators. Artists install massive poster of child’s face in Pakistan field to shame drone operators. Retrieved April 27, 2014, from http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/04/06/artists-install-massive-poster-of-childs-face-in-pakistan-field-to-shame-drone-operators/#.U0HpmWJMrSI.facebook

4) Pappalardo, J. (2014, February 12). Everything You Wanted to Know About Drones. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/planes-uavs/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-drones-15093934

5)Munoz, C. (2013, May 9). Turf battle builds quietly in Congress over control of armed drone program. TheHill. Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/292501-turf-battle-builds-quietly-over-control-of-armed-drone-program-

6)Amy Goodman (2014, Feb 19). Turning a wedding into a funeral: U.S. Drone Strike in Yemen Killed as Many as 12 Civilians

Retrieved: http://www.democracynow.org/2014/2/21/turning_a_wedding_into_a_funeral

7)Steve Nelson (2013, May 23). Drone Attacks Accidentally Killed Americans, Obama Administration Reveal

Assignment 2: Blog Post

I have to admit, I have always hated doing bibliographies. As much as I know it is extremely important to cite, and acknowledge the hard work of those you are referencing in your academic papers, it also always feels like an all expense paid trip to the dentists. The anointed bibliographies is the bonus round of suck. I think it is because, despite how many times I do either, I seem to frequently forget the required format. Outside of my pointless complaining on the subject, I did enjoy reviewing some of the information while preparing the anointed bibliography

1) Are there still aspects of your research question that remain unanswered or that you feel requires further research?

A) The question that still remains the most prominent in my mind, after so much research, is why do we, as a nation, continue to pretend these studies simply do not exist? Time, and time again, I have come across papers, by various researchers, sociologist, psychologist, and psychiatrist, explaining what is best for the fundamental development of our young people, but politicians seem to pretty much ignore this. They on, and on, about helping the American family but it is all just lip service.

2) What are some aspects of your research that you feel would be most interesting to a wide audience?

A) I think most readers would find the results of these studies, concerning youths, crime and the court systems, to be the most fascinating of the paper. If written in a more digestible, less profession vernacular, then people would be able to fully comprehend the magnitude of this problem. It is not about race, religion, or economic status, as much as it is about securing the future of our country by helping youths reach their full potential now.

Week 6, Assignment 2: Blog Post

One of the worse instances of plagiarizing I ever personally encountered occurred at Los Medanos in 2005 during the Spring semester. There was this very talented writer for the college’s community and campus paper, "the Experience", writing a series of rather articulate book reviews for the entertainment section. As the semester continued this writer’s reviews began receiving a number of accolades from readers and became one of the main attractions of the paper. When the time for the annual JAAC awards arrived the Experience won several awards alone on the book reviews.

Unfortunately, as it is often the case, when something appears to be too good to be true it almost certainly is.
Despite working as Feature's Editor, I never read the book reviews because such had nothing to do with my section, so I had no ideas something was “hinky” about the situation. Regardless, an instructor read one of said reviews sometime later, and recognized a one or two paragraphs he recalled having read earlier in a different publication. It turns out that the reviews were being plagiarized from a reviewer that worked out of NY.
When this deception was revealed to the head of the Journalism Department, she personally confronted the suppose writer about the accusation. Unfortunately the student confessed to the plagiarism of several articles, and was summarily suspended. In the spirit of integrity the head of the Journalism Department issued a statement about the incident in the next issue, and informed the JAAC why she was returning the awards.
Plagiarism is not only morally dishonest in the way a student can claim success and credit for someone else’s hard work. This form of dishonesty also completely cheats the very student engaging in such an act out of the knowledge. Even if a person successfully plagiarize the work of someone else they have only achieved a hallow victory. The passing grade might have been obtained but the curriculum has not been learned by the individual. If a student spend most of their academic career getting by through plagiarism they will not be a professional in whatever field they are trying to become a part of.

I cannot claim to have learned much new from this assignment, but I am really happy to know these sort of assignments are being taught to students on a regular basis. It is so easy to get behind in one class or another, then in desperation, attempt to plagiarize one's way out of problem. At other times students can make an honest mistake. Really, this issue is covered, though in much simpler ways, in classes as early as kindergarten: be fair, do not cheat, tell the truth, and do not take what is not yours.

Week 5: Blog Post

Time, and time again it has been irrefutably proven that a lack of resources, opportunities, and an increasing disproportion of wealth acts as an excellent accelerate for criminal elements afflicting human societies. This is especially true concerning the formation and existence of gangs. Such results have been well documented even before Victorian era, British slums of Old Nic, and much has not changed in modern times from the streets of Chicago, Chihuahua, to Kingston and Moscow.

Prevention methods for youth offenders can come in many forms, such as after school activities, summer jobs, community building projects, and team sports. In more serious cases involving "at-risk" youths who may have already committed offenses, come from broken homes, or have joined gangs, mental health programs such as therapy can also be introduced to the equation. With more violent or aggressive youth, who demonstrate a chronic disregard for others, some theorize that pharmaceutical aid, in tandem with rehabilitation programs can produced greater results.

My only concern, when concerning medication, is that too much can be given, or only medication will be given, while forgoing any other form of rehabilitation. There must be strong regulations and guidelines in place to prevent this sort of negligence.

Assignment 2: Blog Post

The more I research the topic the clearer it becomes that the old ways of dealing with Juvenile Delinquency is inefficient at best, and nearly criminal at worst. Locking children away, treating them like animals, and handing out harsh penalties seem to have done nothing other than exacerbate our already bloated prison systems, as juvenile facilities serve as a pipeline to adult facilities. Regardless of how many gang members are arrested, such does not solve the problem, as the conditions that led to the formation of these groups still exist. Our young people serve as the fountain of youth for criminal groups, and they will continue thriving as more youths simply replace those who are locked away our killed, ensuring these gangs never die. We need a far different, more coordinated, and precise method of eliminating the causes of criminality, and not just keep treating the symptoms.