Friday, December 25, 2015

Divided Loyalties and Police Culture


Divided loyalties among the personnel of any given department does not require an issue to occur. This sort of near crippling problem can take place when groups of officers feel stronger loyalties to one commander or another, or when those in command throw their lot in with different local politicians and city officials who may each have opposing goals.

What follows is a cautionary tale, exemplifying just how far groups of officers can deteriorate, when loyalties are strained, twisted, and diverted.

In Crestview, Florida the department's trouble began after Maj. Joseph Floyd joined their ranks. Unknown to his fellow officers, Floyd had a record that would have rivaled that of many harden criminals. For 8 straight years this supposed officer of the law was fired, quit, or forced to resign from three separate police departments for charges ranging from falsifying reports, lying, insubordination, and excessive force. However, Floyd's transgressions started long before he was ever given a badge. Even as a civilian he had been arrested for disorderly conduct, assaulting an officer, and battery.

He would continue his deviancy well into his new career with the Crestview police department. By 2012 he would be investigated by a grand jury for such offenses as altering testimonies, forging incident reports, soliciting sex from residents, beating handcuffed suspects, intimidating and threatening members of the community, sexually assaulting a fellow female officer, and causing a pregnant woman to miscarriage after ramming her vehicle with his car.

How was it possible for such an individual to acquire a job at Crestview's department? This is where divide in loyalties begin. Floyd was old friends with police chief Brian Mitchell, who despite being fully aware of his record and criminal past, shielded him from the investigation process of normal hiring procedures. Mitchell made a conscious decision to place his loyalty to his friend above that of his subordinates. In doing such-- if even unintentionally-- he placed the safety of those officers, along with the integrity, and reputation of the entire Crestview department, in jeopardy.

How did the hiring of Floyd lead to the turmoil and divided loyalties that plagued the department for years? This created a “Us vs Them” scenario between those officers that went along and covered for Floyd, and thus stood with the chief, and those who openly resisted to cover or follow his lead.

The Officers who made attempts to complain about Floyd's less than professional conduct, or wanted to file a report about some criminal activity they personally witnessed, Mitchell reportedly ordered them “to go through the chain of command”, which he was more than aware meant these very same officers would have to report directly to Floyd to do so. This was later proven to be nothing more than blatant scare and intimidation tactics meant to dissuade any further attempts against his friend.

Of course, in such work conditions where co-workers began to lose trust in each other, and the command structure, moral quickly began to rapidly disintegrate. Those officers that wanted to do what was right found themselves trapped in an increasingly hostile environment where threats of termination, demotion, and reassignment were not only constant, but also coupled with overt harassment. Floyd even began instructing his unit, now more loyal to him than to the rest of their department, to spy and report to him on fellow officers who were not loyal.

The growing division lead to a decrease in Crestview police performance. Floyd's unit routinely harried, arrested, and planted evidence on members of the surrounding community. By the end their corruption became some brazen they began investigating members of other departments, and local politicians simply in search of some information they could use in bribery.

Eventually the grand jury would charge Floyd with Racketeering, with others pending further investigation. Investigation would also be conducted on Mitchell but no criminal charges leveled against him. Instead a report about the chief said, “His failure to redress Maj. Floyd's offensive and humiliating conduct toward women and co-workers was indefensible”. He was summarily fired.

A new police chief, Tony Taylor, would step in with hopes of rebuilding the badly damaged Crestview department. However, by then, even after the removal of the trouble elements, the damages were extensive. mistrust, low morale, and resentment was deeply set among those remaining officers who found themselves targeted, abused and mistreated by a system they once believed in.

Even Taylor would eventually admit that the divided loyalties left him struggling to unite the department once more after all the ruin left by Mitchell and Floyd. Further making an already tense matters more difficult was also having to face the erosion of trust from the surrounding community.


Perhaps it is not much in the wake of so much hardship, but the grand jurors would note in their report that the officers that remained dedicated and devoted to their duties, despite such a clearly dysfunctional and hostile environment were “exemplary and heartening”. Maybe are a sign that Crestview has a chance at redemption, and regaining the communities trust.

In the end, an officers of any given department effectiveness, or integrity should not be judged based solely on how loyal they are to one another, or to different individuals. This is more inline with one of the ways members of crime syndicates, or street gangs prove their worth. If being an officer of the law only required a gang mentality, numbers, and weapons, then local officials could begin rounding up members of the Crips, M13, or Skinheads to serve as the city's enforcement agents.

The men, and women of law enforcement must also have loyalty for the oath, and duties they have been entrusted with. They are more than guns, or authority, as they also represent the law, integrity, and protection. When police officers begin choosing individual loyalties above the law, tragedy, corruption, and shame is never far behind.


References
Riggs, M. (2012, March 13). Meet Maj. Joseph Floyd, Leading Candidate for Most Crooked Cop in America. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from https://reason.com/blog/2012/03/13/meet-maj-joseph-floyd-the-most-crooked-c

Pruett, T. (2015, August 20). Court upholds Floyd’s racketeering conviction. Retrieved December 25, 2015, from http://www.nwfdailynews.com/article/20150820/NEWS/150829928

 

No comments:

Post a Comment